[Frugalware-devel] gtk+2-2.10.0 report and warnings

Priyank priyankmg at gmail.com
Thu Jul 6 11:34:12 CEST 2006


lol, oops!
i mean i agree with Alex and IroNiQ :) we should bump it  ! :)

On 7/6/06, Alex Smith <alex.extreme2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/07/06, Priyank <priyankmg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Krix, we must bump gnome so that we'll be able to discover
> > the bugs and fix them out by the next release..
> >
>
> Don't you mean that you agree with IroNiQ and me? :P It's me and IroNiQ
> saying we should bump it :P
>
>  On 7/6/06, Krisztian VASAS < iron at frugalware.org > wrote:
> > >
> > > Christian Hamar wrote:
> > > >> Well, the main reason for doing this is bug hunting. 0.5 will
> > > >> definitely have 2.16 (the stable release). Bumping to 2.15 and
> > > getting
> > > >> bugs ironed out *now* will ensure that 0.5 will have a stable
> > > Gnome,
> > > >> which is much better than a buggy Gnome like we had in 0.4. If it's
> > > ok
> > > >> with everyone I will probably bump to 2.15 sometime soon.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Soso. If you remember there was a discussion about this in the past.
> > > At
> > > > some 0.4pre* version. Then there was bump from 2.12 to 2.13 or not
> > > to
> > > > bump. We choose not to bump.
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand something. If we got in the repos gnome 2.15 then
> > > why
> > > > we got bug hunting ? Bugs already hunted and fixed and will be
> > > hunted /
> > > > fixed for 2.16 release.
> > > >
> > > > Afterall if we just bump for 2.16 and we got bugs then we got the
> > > same
> > > > result that we bump to 2.15 for now.
> > >
> > > Well, not exactly. If we bump to 2.15 now, maybe we can discover the
> > > bugs and we have much more time to fix them/report them so gnome can
> > > be
> > > more stable. And we can get ready for the possible bugs that can be in
> > > the stable 2.16 version. If we don't bump, then the bugs won't be
> > > discovered and the same result as 0.4: gnome doesn't work properly.
> > >
> > > > brr. I don't agree to bumping gnome to unstable for now.
> > >
> > > 2:2 the result. Someone?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > IroNiQ
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Frugalware-devel mailing list
> > > Frugalware-devel at frugalware.org
> > > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thou shalt never follow a null pointer, for at its end, madness and
> > chaos lie !
> >
> > Priyank M. Gosalia
> > Member of the Frugalware Linux Developer Team
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Frugalware-devel mailing list
> > Frugalware-devel at frugalware.org
> > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Frugalware-devel mailing list
> Frugalware-devel at frugalware.org
> http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
>
>
>


-- 
Thou shalt never follow a null pointer, for at its end, madness and chaos
lie !

Priyank M. Gosalia
Member of the Frugalware Linux Developer Team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20060706/5c89c0e9/attachment.html


More information about the Frugalware-devel mailing list