[Frugalware-devel] Maintainer needed for ROX

[Krisztian VASAS]

On Fri Feb 16, 2007 at 12:09:44 +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
>VOROSKOI Andras wrote:
>>On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:58:57PM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
>>>All the ROX packages are not maintained for a long time now ( and I
>>>guess some are already broken ).
>>IMO it's time to move ROX as we should not include it in 0.6 without
>>m8r.
>>I would also vote for removing of frugalpkg, frugalrledit, gtkpacman,
>>guzuta, jacman and libpypac.
>>Those are also broken imo. What do you think?
>
>I agree with all but frugalrledit :) frugalrledit does work for me.
>
>The foo_pacman_frontend are all broken and should go away.
>
>ROX maybe we move it or nobuild it for 0.6 ?!

I think nobuild is enough. If someone wants to use or maintain it, we don't
have to search for it in the darcs tree, just remove the nobuild.
IMHO


IroNiQ
-- 
Member of Frugalware Developer Team
Web: http://www.ironiq.hu
LinuxCounter: #331532
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20070216/7c599e7c/attachment.bin