[Frugalware-devel] provides=('httpd') or something

[Gabriel C]

VMiklos wrote:
> Na Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:47:27PM +0200, CSÉCSY László <boobaa at frugalware.org> pisal(a):
>> To sum up, here is a Call For Vote: which one do you prefer?
>> 1. the way I suggested (let's rename the package to match the binary), or
>> 2. the way most distros do (let's rename upstream's binary to match pkgname)?
> 
> the original question was about adding a provide() which is fine for me
> 
> i'm against renaming/patching apache. if we really want to make some
> consistency, then we could rename rc.httpd to rc.apache, but then you
> have to write a proper upgrade script - good luck ;)

Not really , just 2 relbumps :P

apache relbump with 'both' scripts. ( eg the same script twice but different names )
pre_upgrade() remove rc.httpd from runlevel ( if there ) add rc.apache.

realbump again with just rc.apache and noone will ever notice :P ( ohh well all not reading this =) )

> 
> VMiklos
> 

crazy