[Frugalware-devel] switching to git?

[VMiklos]

Na Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 03:36:11PM +0200, VOROSKOI Andras <voroskoi at frugalware.org> pisal(a):
> Sure, i wote for git, but i'm not sure if you want to convert all the
> repos or fw-current only.
> The other ones are way smaller than the frugalware repo, so switching is
> not necessary. On the other hand using one scm for everything is simpler(?).

provided that i do not plan to remove darcs support from any tool, i
don't want to _force_ others to use git for small repos (ie
fw-control-center or upstart-jobs, these are maintained by priyank and
alex, it's up to them if they switch or not)

for me, it's easier to use one scm for most tasks, but if somebody says
"use the right scm for the given task" and want to use both darcs and
git for projects, it's okay

> Which means we start using git and see if it works out or not, right? I
> mean who has time to commit changes to both repo?

the current git repo is a sandbox, it helps me to add git support to
tools then it'll help others to test the updated tools. of course you
don't have to push every change to it

> So imo we should just switch and if we got problems (i do not think we
> will have) we just copy the changes from git to darcs.

sure, when we think the tools are ready, we can do a freeze for a few
days and just switch

thanks,
VMiklos

-- 
developer of Frugalware Linux - http://frugalware.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20070629/2f959a72/attachment.bin