[Frugalware-devel] subpkgs vs docs

[Gabriel C]

Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:01:55PM +0100, Gabriel C <crazy at pimpmylinux.org> wrote:
>> In fact I don't like that as well but we have to do something about.
>>
>> I think we could do in fact 2 and 3 and let the developer decide in what way he want provide the LICENSE
>> files for such packages. E.g: add a new option like sublicense and do nothing by default but check for it
>> and if foo package has subpackages but sublicense is not set nor an foo-license subpackage exists error out
>> with a nice message and point to the man page or alike.
>>
>> Sounds crazy he ? =)
> 
> yes ;)
> 
> speaking about directives, i got an idea. we already have a license
> directive, but it's optional and we don't really use it. what about
> making it required for pkgs where there are subpkgs?

Hmm I don't really like this =) 

When we want to force that then we should force for all packages.

crazy